Middle-of-the-road conundrum
When I turn on my Tesla 'Autopilot', the car sits squarely in the middle of the lane, much more accurately than if I were driving it myself.
It occurred to me to wonder, as more people use these devices, what that might do to the wear and compression of the road surface?
Of course, cars aren't all the same width, but they don't differ too much, so perhaps over time we'll end up running in little tracks; a kind of guided busway, where it'll be harder to drift accidentally out of your lane even in the absence of electronic assistance.
Or perhaps car manufacturers will be required to introduce a a little randomised 'drift' into their algorithms to stop the roads having to be repaired so often?
Comments
Alas, no, and this is becoming more of a problem.
I think I'll pay for the upgrade when it can just fly over them.
"Potholes? Where we're going, we won't hit potholes."
Yes, as Steve also pointed out. But it's not always a big difference - my Model 3 is only about 9% heavier than, say, an Audi Avant or VW Passat, and way, way lighter than something like a Discovery.
I think road wear increases with the cube or even fourth power of the weight, though, so even slight increases are significant, but it also means that most cars have negligible effects when compared to a truck or a bus!